What is up with Mixed?
Things that were different to me:
- Pace of the game -> it is slower than club that is for sure. I think this should be fairly obvious, but more noticeable to me when you throw the open game nearby. I don't feel that you have to work as hard on O or D (Note: this does not mean it is always easier, there were plenty of times where I was covered or my man burned me, etc. Many people who could play in the open game @ natties, but not every guy on the field could.) It seemed before the point when the matchup became obvious, I would know how difficult it would be. If I was matched up against the "more known" players, it was a bit more difficult than if I did not recognize/know my opponent. This is true in open, for example more difficult to guard Chase on Sockeye than say #56 or something like that. BUT, the "7th" guy in open is better/more of a threat than say the #4 guy in coed. At least, that is my opinion.
- Isolating -> On D, it is much more isolating guarding your person downfield. In the open, you make a mistake or take a risk and jump something on defense. You, most likely, have someone else there to back you up. In mixed, you can't really overpursue or be too aggressive on the under, because you are the last man back a lot of the times. Really the only man back. And the ez score is not really worth it. Guarding the tall dude Mahoney as the only guy downfield is a lot of fun. Also, there is more of starting a man as a "handler" and taking off deep in terms of an iso cut. Again, no men to help out behind you, so if your person beats you early or you let it go for a couple steps, well it will be sent. It definitely makes you think about the position you are guarding the other man.
- Many Weird Throws -> maybe close to huck n hope, but definitely zany throws are encouraged. Part of this has to do with more 1-on-1 matchups downfield, so if you have an angle you just need to throw. Lord knows, I forced a couple deep shots to James when he was iso'd and had a good matchup. Knowing there is no last back to help out, makes it a bit more comforting as a thrower. So "less normal" throws are very effective and can be used for good. By less normal, I mean like anverts or crazy hammers or dying ducks to the breakside, etc. A strategy decision for sure that might getting d'd up more in open due to more guys on the field.
- College-ish -> the game reminds me of playing college, mainly b/c the O is not as efficient. There have been some good college O teams and not really good mixed ones as well. But there was not a team all year that I thought they would not give us the disc with a bit of pressure. Never did I feel, or crap we are down by XX, how the hell are we coming back. Again, not to seem like I am completely slamming coed, I mean Slow White played great to maintain a lead in the 2nd half against us. Tandem was effective, until the rain came. Shazam always maintain their huge leads. But, we still got the disc from them and could not convert. At times, it did not feel if we were going to get the d, but will we be able to score when we get it. Make sense? No real team that I would consider an automatic scoring machine.
- Women -> I feel there is a differernce in throwing the disc to a tightly covered man vs. tightly covered woman. I am more likely to throw to a man that is closely covered on an under then I am to throw to a woman that is tightly covered. I feel this was killing me earlier in the year and adjusted. On that note, women get much more open than men do on unders. So I still feel I throw to them. Also, the best teams utilize their women much more than the not as best teams do. Let's draw the line at 9th. Everyone above really good. Everyone below just good. We played most of the top 8 teams this year (dnp Barrio and Amp). The 6 teams we played had significant contribution from multiple women. Tandem used their women the least, probably, but they got a lot of the shorter women who was a cutter. The couple of teams we played below, our women kind of had free reign. Maybe not so much on O (but our women did score more goals in those games), but really on d it was obvious. Not that we just shut their women down, it was more of a lot more poaching/looking for ways to get involved in d.
- Zone -> this is where I thought of the gender difference the most. For example, I played deep d quite a bit. And I really pushed the yardage gap between myself and a woman deep. I would say 30 + yards at times. I do not think I got beat by a woman deep, but found I got beat if I played to deep on a woman and a man slid in between myself and the short deep or wing. In an attempt to stop this, I tried to always adjust to where the deep man was and kind of let the thrower think about putting something deep/crazy/bladey to the woman. (Whereas as an "open deep deep" I would only really account for the wind and most likely throw as a "coed deep deep" I searched for the deep men on the opposing team and relied on the sidelines to keep track of the deep women). I am sure this is not rocket science to everyone and most people who are confident to play deep deep would do this, but I was definitely reading to facial expressions/looks of the thrower a bit more. I felt I could tell if the throwers were confident enough in their woman receiver a couple of throws into the zone point. I got a d late in the tandem game in zone on the above mentioned shorter woman who was an excellent cutter. I mean, I am close to a foot taller than her. But I could tell that this team was willing to put a lot of stuff to her, so I was a little more cautious in terms of where she was. In our later games, I was not so worried. Also, when I was popping or handling in the zone o, I looked to attack where the woman was upfield (most teams had a woman as wing). Basically, I searched for the man guarded by woman match-up. And I tried not to throw to a woman on the sideline as much. Most coed zones invovled a man marking and looking to trap (see below comment on marking).
- Marking -> definitely teams look to get ds and really get excited when women have the disc near the trap sideline (including our team). It kind of makes sense, because many teams don't have 3 experienced throwing women on the field. That is fine. I would try to get our team to press the men on the trap sideline more. This is a big reason for Shazam's success (I think). I feel they pressured the men as much as the women. A constant pressure no matter who had the disc. Whereas all other teams, I did not ever get the feeling of this huge pressure from the opposing team's defense. Now, I have motivated all coed teams to improve their man on man defense... Seriously though, if all 7 people all playing hard defense, I think you can force things a bit more.
- Pace of the game -> it is slower than club that is for sure. I think this should be fairly obvious, but more noticeable to me when you throw the open game nearby. I don't feel that you have to work as hard on O or D (Note: this does not mean it is always easier, there were plenty of times where I was covered or my man burned me, etc. Many people who could play in the open game @ natties, but not every guy on the field could.) It seemed before the point when the matchup became obvious, I would know how difficult it would be. If I was matched up against the "more known" players, it was a bit more difficult than if I did not recognize/know my opponent. This is true in open, for example more difficult to guard Chase on Sockeye than say #56 or something like that. BUT, the "7th" guy in open is better/more of a threat than say the #4 guy in coed. At least, that is my opinion.
- Isolating -> On D, it is much more isolating guarding your person downfield. In the open, you make a mistake or take a risk and jump something on defense. You, most likely, have someone else there to back you up. In mixed, you can't really overpursue or be too aggressive on the under, because you are the last man back a lot of the times. Really the only man back. And the ez score is not really worth it. Guarding the tall dude Mahoney as the only guy downfield is a lot of fun. Also, there is more of starting a man as a "handler" and taking off deep in terms of an iso cut. Again, no men to help out behind you, so if your person beats you early or you let it go for a couple steps, well it will be sent. It definitely makes you think about the position you are guarding the other man.
- Many Weird Throws -> maybe close to huck n hope, but definitely zany throws are encouraged. Part of this has to do with more 1-on-1 matchups downfield, so if you have an angle you just need to throw. Lord knows, I forced a couple deep shots to James when he was iso'd and had a good matchup. Knowing there is no last back to help out, makes it a bit more comforting as a thrower. So "less normal" throws are very effective and can be used for good. By less normal, I mean like anverts or crazy hammers or dying ducks to the breakside, etc. A strategy decision for sure that might getting d'd up more in open due to more guys on the field.
- College-ish -> the game reminds me of playing college, mainly b/c the O is not as efficient. There have been some good college O teams and not really good mixed ones as well. But there was not a team all year that I thought they would not give us the disc with a bit of pressure. Never did I feel, or crap we are down by XX, how the hell are we coming back. Again, not to seem like I am completely slamming coed, I mean Slow White played great to maintain a lead in the 2nd half against us. Tandem was effective, until the rain came. Shazam always maintain their huge leads. But, we still got the disc from them and could not convert. At times, it did not feel if we were going to get the d, but will we be able to score when we get it. Make sense? No real team that I would consider an automatic scoring machine.
- Women -> I feel there is a differernce in throwing the disc to a tightly covered man vs. tightly covered woman. I am more likely to throw to a man that is closely covered on an under then I am to throw to a woman that is tightly covered. I feel this was killing me earlier in the year and adjusted. On that note, women get much more open than men do on unders. So I still feel I throw to them. Also, the best teams utilize their women much more than the not as best teams do. Let's draw the line at 9th. Everyone above really good. Everyone below just good. We played most of the top 8 teams this year (dnp Barrio and Amp). The 6 teams we played had significant contribution from multiple women. Tandem used their women the least, probably, but they got a lot of the shorter women who was a cutter. The couple of teams we played below, our women kind of had free reign. Maybe not so much on O (but our women did score more goals in those games), but really on d it was obvious. Not that we just shut their women down, it was more of a lot more poaching/looking for ways to get involved in d.
- Zone -> this is where I thought of the gender difference the most. For example, I played deep d quite a bit. And I really pushed the yardage gap between myself and a woman deep. I would say 30 + yards at times. I do not think I got beat by a woman deep, but found I got beat if I played to deep on a woman and a man slid in between myself and the short deep or wing. In an attempt to stop this, I tried to always adjust to where the deep man was and kind of let the thrower think about putting something deep/crazy/bladey to the woman. (Whereas as an "open deep deep" I would only really account for the wind and most likely throw as a "coed deep deep" I searched for the deep men on the opposing team and relied on the sidelines to keep track of the deep women). I am sure this is not rocket science to everyone and most people who are confident to play deep deep would do this, but I was definitely reading to facial expressions/looks of the thrower a bit more. I felt I could tell if the throwers were confident enough in their woman receiver a couple of throws into the zone point. I got a d late in the tandem game in zone on the above mentioned shorter woman who was an excellent cutter. I mean, I am close to a foot taller than her. But I could tell that this team was willing to put a lot of stuff to her, so I was a little more cautious in terms of where she was. In our later games, I was not so worried. Also, when I was popping or handling in the zone o, I looked to attack where the woman was upfield (most teams had a woman as wing). Basically, I searched for the man guarded by woman match-up. And I tried not to throw to a woman on the sideline as much. Most coed zones invovled a man marking and looking to trap (see below comment on marking).
- Marking -> definitely teams look to get ds and really get excited when women have the disc near the trap sideline (including our team). It kind of makes sense, because many teams don't have 3 experienced throwing women on the field. That is fine. I would try to get our team to press the men on the trap sideline more. This is a big reason for Shazam's success (I think). I feel they pressured the men as much as the women. A constant pressure no matter who had the disc. Whereas all other teams, I did not ever get the feeling of this huge pressure from the opposing team's defense. Now, I have motivated all coed teams to improve their man on man defense... Seriously though, if all 7 people all playing hard defense, I think you can force things a bit more.